Hi!
> > > Which shouldn't be true. There is no fundamental reason why
> > > ordinary writes should be slower than O_DIRECT.
> >
> > Again, there IS a reason: O_DIRECT eliminates the cpu overhead of the
> > kernel-user copy,
>
> You assume that ordinary read()/write() is *required* to do the copying.
> It doesn't. Kernel is allowed to do direct DMAing in this case too.
Kernel is allowed, but it is practically impossible to code. It would
require slow MMU magic.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
