On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:56:30AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 02:18:19 +0100 Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> > Due to almost zer0 activity, this may be last attempt.
>
> Are all of these patches in -mm for testing?
Nope.
Roman Zippel joined, when i've posted one of them for testing. His
comments were (only) available at that time. And they led me to better
solution as well (for option checking in particular). Nothing from him
since then.
Patch with localversion, where i assumed wrongly "localversion~is-ok" are
OK to be valid, changed to handle, what it should handle (see patched
comments).
Last one -- gawk with frieds, got strange comments about SUSv3
compliance. But, since i've posted my tests,
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/489286>
nobody replied.
> ---
> ~Randy
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
