On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 16:11 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 20:54 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Indeed, I'm expecting to push lguest this week, and this code will
> > > effect me, so I'd like to see this in a -mm soon...
> >
> > Yes, I took a look at the lguest changes today and I think these won't
> > generate conflicts, just make stuff easier for you ;) Course you've now
> > got a couple new paravirt-ops to support, but the native ones are fine
> > for temporary use.
>
> Implementing stolen time is something I'd like to do, since it'd be a
> nice self-contained example the expectations.
hmm stolen time could even be useful without virtualization; to a large
degree, if cpufreq reduces the speed of your cpu you have "stolen
cycles" that way... I wonder if this concept can be used for that as
well...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
