Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No, that's *really* it ;)

For syscalls, sure.

The kevent work incorporates Uli's desire to have more data per event. Have you read his OLS stuff? It's been a while since I did so I've lost the details of why he cares to have more.

Let me say it again, maybe a little louder this time: I'm not interested in worrying about this aspect of the API until the scheduler mechanics are more solidified.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux