On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 12:06:47AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 2/5/07, Miles Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > >Are any of these worth fixing? > > I am preparing a patch for this. > I will submit it soon. > Many of those warnings I have already fixed. I had posted quite a few patches. Looks like some of these have not made into mainline yet. For ex... http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm3/broken-out/x86_64-mm-move-startup_32-in-texthead-section.patch http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20-rc6/2.6.20-rc6-mm3/broken-out/x86_64-mm-break-init-in-two-parts-to-avoid-modpost-warnings.patch I think I should trace the status of all the patches I had posted. Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- References:
- 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- From: "Miles Lane" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>
- 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- Prev by Date: Re: forcedeth problems on 2.6.20-rc6-mm3
- Next by Date: Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] kexec: Fix CONFIG_SMP=n compilation (ia64)
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.20 -- Loads of section mismatches
- Index(es):
 |