Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick

> ACK, and "BSD" etc. should be included. I kept the combinations for 
> backward-compatibility. Possibly we could warn on using them.

BSD is intentionally not allowed. Any proprietary vendor can decide their
code is BSD and never release source just let people play with the
binary. That is why we enforce at least dual.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
  - From: Bodo Eggert <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Battery life on Lenovo X60s
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] alternative aproach to: Ban module license tag string termination trick
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]