Arjan van de Ven wrote:
But you're right, the MODULE_LICENSE tag really does imply that
licenses other than the GPL are ok.
yup.. BSD licensed modules are clearly ok as well..
So I guess we're going to go with Jan's change then.
I just wanted to discuss this briefly since I'm very keen for the kernel
not to enforce legal/DRM type policy at all - this isn't quite the same
discussion as we've had previously but the point remains: it should be
for people to realize when they are violating a license as software
unfortunately cannot ever be intelligent to catch all the baddies.
Personally, I am less worried if people use an obvious "PROPRIETARY"
label because they're at least admitting and saying it how it is - then
if later it can be shown that they are in fact violating kernel
copyright, they've helped to sign their own death warrant :-)
Jon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]