Re: [PATCH 2 of 4] Introduce i386 fibril scheduling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Priorities cannot be shared, as they have to adapt to the per-request
priority when we get down to the nitty gitty of POSIX AIO, as otherwise
realtime issues like keepalive transmits will be handled incorrectly.

Well, maybe not *blind* sharing. But something more than the disconnect threads currently have with current->ioprio.

Today an existing kernel thread would most certainly ignore a sys_ioprio_set() in the submitter and then handle an aio syscall with an old current->ioprio.

Something more smart than that is all I'm on about.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux