Re: [patch 7/9] Adapt the time initialization code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > +extern void time_initialize_cpu(void);
> 
> Never put externs into .c files. Multiple occurrences.

Ok, will fix it, sorry.

> > +void time_initialize_cpu(void *info)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 
> Are you sure this can never preempt? 

yes, preemption is explicitly disabled in start_secondary() that
calls this function.

> > +	/* FIXME: what speed does the cpu really start at; I doubt cpu_khz is right at this point ??!!!
> 
> It should be. It comes from measurements. Unless the CPU changes frequency
> behind the kernel's back, but there is nothing that can be done then.

Well, I'm not sure. I think the global variable cpu_khz is wrong
in the first place. This should be per-cpu, because each CPU can
have a different frequency, right?

And cpu_khz is adjusted in time_cpufreq_notifier() when whichever
CPU's frequency changes.  To me it seems that it's a leftover from
the times when all CPUs in a system ran at the same speed. I
think it should be killed. I just did not want to make too many
unrelated changes in one patchset.

It doesn't matter that much in this case that it probably is
wrong (as the comment explains)...


-- 
Jiri Bohac <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux