Re: 2.6.20-rc6 ramdisk problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 17:54 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
I'm not sure if there's an inherent max ramdisk size limit, however I should point out that in most cases, using a tmpfs or ramfs file system is better than old-style ramdisks. Those filesystems return unused memory to the kernel (ramdisks statically allocate the entire space) and also avoid the filesystem overhead of ramdisks (the files are mapped into pagecache directly).

This is not a question of what's better or not.
Michal stepped into a real life problem:

1. ramdisk gets created in the first place w/o problems
2. formatting the same ramdisk succeeds
3. trying to use it fails

So either #1 or #2 should have failed in the first place. Failing in #3
is definitely a BUG in #1 or #2.

How does your advise help to fix that BUG ? Ignoring it by using
something else ?

Yes, there is likely a bug here of some sort. However, that doesn't change the fact that ramdisks are sub-optimal for most uses.

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux