On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 09:39 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > please read my reply above! To repeat: such flags tend to get forgotten,
> > resulting in a less safe default behavior. Clock hardware and thus
> > clocksources are fundamentally fragile so we want to default to the
> > safest behavior. I.e. if the IS_CONTINOUS flag is 'forgotten', the clock
> > wont be usable as a clock verification base for example. The flag has to
> > be affirmatively set to mark the clocksource continous.
>
> I don't see this as an issue .. Your assuming that not continuous clocks
> will be prevalent which they aren't ..
And how does this change Ingo's statement ? Such beasts exist and having
them default to the safe side is good.
Also I really do not see the "huge burden" for a clocksource coder to
add this flag. If he forgets it, then he can not use highres / dynticks
and nothing breaks.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
