Re: [linux-pm] question on resume()

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> > > So, this means, on suspend():
> > > 
> > > 1. Don't worry about TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> > > 2. Do worry about TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
> > > We have to cease IO and must not call wake_up_interruptible()
> > 
> > "cease IO"? No, I believe it is enough not to start new I/O. Userspace
> > is frozen at that point, it can't ask you to do I/O.
> >
> > > Isn't that a race until suspend() is called?
> > 
> > I do not think so.
> 
> What about URBs in flight which are waited for with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE?

Same thing as if someone sent a signal to that process. (We are
talking about user processes here, right? Kernel threads have to take
care themselves).

> > > On resume():
> > > 
> > > 1. Don't worry about TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> > > 2. Do not restart IO that may call wake_up_interruptible()
> > > 
> > > When do we restart such IO?
> > 
> > We reuse signal handling code to do that for us. It is same situation
> > as when someone signals task doing I/O.
> 
> What happens to tasks in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE which are frozen?
> Are they interrupted and frozen?

Interrupted with fake signal, then frozen, yes.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/