On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:31, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>
> > On solution would be to move the notify_active flag from ctx->spu
> > into ctx itself, but maybe there are other ways to solve this.
> In an earlier review of this patch, Christopher Hellwig suggested I move
> the notify_active flag to be a bit in the sched_flags field that's added
> in his scheduler patch series. If this patch series will be a available
> in an "Arnd" tree that we'll be using for our current OProfile
> development, perhaps I should wait until that time to change this, since
> the window of vulnerability is quite small. What do you think?
Sounds good to me.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]