Arnd:
Well most of the patch is simply cleaning up the
pm_rtas_activate_signals() routine. I would be think
"pm_rtas_activat_signals routine cleanup" would be good.
Carl Love
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 05:08 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 29 January 2007 20:47, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> > The code was setting up the debug bus for group 21 when profiling on the
> > event PPU CYCLES. The debug bus is not actually used by the hardware
> > performance counters when counting PPU CYCLES. Setting up the debug bus
> > for PPU CYCLES causes signal routing conflicts on the debug bus when
> > profiling PPU cycles and another PPU event. This patch fixes the code to
> > only setup the debug bus to route the performance signals for the non
> > PPU CYCLE events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Carl Love <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> Any suggestion for a one-line patch title?
> _______________________________________________
> cbe-oss-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/cbe-oss-dev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
