RE: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

["Kaz Kylheku" <kaz@zeugmasystems.com>]

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> I described in details why and how M:N model better, and its drawbacks
> include all issues mentioned by Ulrich Drepper, but nevertheless its
> advantages are far too superiour than those which can be
> provided by 1:1
> model.

M:N threading is an unnecessary performance hack that's needed by people
who are living in a C or C++ exile away from some language that has
lexical closures, generators or first-class continuations. Not having
these niceties, they resort to emulating them with threads. The proper
thing to do is to rewrite the code to use state machines which can be
driven by any available thread. Or else, write yourself a
source-to-source transformer that will give C the lexical closure,
generator, or continuation features that you need to express the
solution that way.

There is no need to retain any vestiges of a user space threading
implementation when you have the real thing.

Programs which appear to benefit from that model are badly optimized or
badly designed. A smartly written program uses an available thread to do
as much work as possible, until that thread happens to block or its time
slice burns up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/