--- Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:08:39AM -0800, Casey
> Schaufler wrote:
> > Alternativly you could move the SELinux specific
> > bits out of /proc/self/attr into an equivalent
> > /selinux/self/attr and avoid that /proc
> dependency.
>
> Why?
To avoid the dependency and remove the issue.
Just a thought. Weigh the advantages and
disadvantages and do what seems right.
> procfs is essential for any kind of fullblown
> linux system,
Kids!
> and the selinux actually fits into the original
> procfs intention,
Yes, it does. It's a good use of /proc.
> unlike all the other junk we've added over the
> years.
You won't get any arguements from me there.
Casey Schaufler
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
