Re: Fw: Re: [mm PATCH 4/6] RCU: (now) CPU hotplug

[Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 06:45:49PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> 	static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> 	{
> 		int err;
> 		struct task_struct *p;
> 		cpumask_t old_allowed, tmp;
> 
> 		if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> 			return -EBUSY;
> 
> 		if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> 			return -EINVAL;
> 
> 		if (freeze_processes()) {
> 			err = -EBUSY;
> 			goto out_freeze_notify_failed;
> 		}
> 		err = raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
> 							(void *)(long)cpu);
> 		if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
> 			printk("%s: attempt to take down CPU %u failed\n",
> 					__FUNCTION__, cpu);
> 			err = -EINVAL;
> 			goto out_freeze_notify_failed;
> 		}
> 
> 		/* Ensure that we are not runnable on dying cpu */
> 		old_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
> 		tmp = CPU_MASK_ALL;
> 		cpu_clear(cpu, tmp);
> 		set_cpus_allowed(current, tmp);
> 
> 		mutex_lock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);

We won't be needing this lock either, since it forms the core of
the unpopular lock_cpu_hotplug :-)

> 		p = __stop_machine_run(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpu);
> 		mutex_unlock(&cpu_bitmask_lock);

Looks good. 

I'm wondering if we'll need to try_to_freeze in the fork and exit code 
as well :?

Thanks and Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/