On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:18:17AM +0100, Samuel Thibault ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Evgenity, le Mon 29 Jan 2007 16:47:36 +0100, a écrit :
> > Userspace M-on-N threading model is based on the idea, that when signal
> > is delivered, kernel saves all information related to previous context
> > in stack, so it is possible to find it and replace.
>
> You may want to have a look at some existing implementations:
I saw most of them.
As far as I recall, only PTL (is not shown here) has preemptible
scheduler. NTL has it too, but is based on different approach.
> - Good old `FSU Pthreads' http://moss.csc.ncsu.edu/~mueller/pthreads/
> - fully POSIX-compliant `GnuPth' http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/
> - server-targetted `Capriccio'
> www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jcondit/capriccio-sosp-2003.pdf
> - efficient `ELiTE/Erlangen'
> http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Projects/FORTWIHR/ELiTE/
> - and our portable, flexible, efficient `Marcel'
> http://runtime.futurs.inria.fr/marcel/
>
> Samuel
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
