* Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Easy to name an example, as they are pretty generic. When sharing
> irqs -- usually ATA is configured to PCI native (IO-APIC-fasteoi) --
> any interrupt storm causes the other devices sharing that irq to crap
> themselves (kernel turns off irq, suggests irqpoll, etc.)
ok. Can you suggest any way for me to reproduce such a bug artificially
on a test system? [i have both old and new systems, so if you can think
of a way for me to trigger this i'd be happy to try]
I /think/ my two patches should automatically avoid the 'cap themselves'
effect you outlined: the absolutely worst case should be that we'll have
twice the IRQ rate of the optimal one - but no irq storm nor lost
interrupts should happen due to irq trigger type mismatches, ever - as
long as the basic mapping of device to IRQ is correct. [ I tried to push
to include this in v2.6.20 but i lost that argument ;-) ]
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
