Re: [PATCH] namespaces: fix exit race by splitting exit

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>]

Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at):
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:30:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:26:59 -0600
> > "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Fix exit race by splitting the nsproxy putting into two pieces.
> > > First piece reduces the nsproxy refcount.  If we dropped the last
> > > reference, then it puts the mnt_ns, and returns the nsproxy as a
> > > hint to the caller.  Else it returns NULL.  The second piece of
> > > exiting task namespaces sets tsk->nsproxy to NULL, and drops the
> > > references to other namespaces and frees the nsproxy only if an
> > > nsproxy was passed in.
> > > 
> > > A little awkward and should probably be reworked, but hopefully
> > > it fixes the NFS oops.
> > 
> > I'm a bit worried about jamming something like this into 2.6.20.
> > Could the usual culprits please review this carefully with 
> > some urgency?
> 
> okay, after integrating this into two Linux-VServer
> branches and some testing, I can confirm that it 
> _seems_ to fix the nfs and related issues, but still, 
> I do not like it :)

I don't either  :)

> here my issues with this approach:
> 
>  - the code is quite hard to read and can easily
>    lead to unexpected issues when spaces are
>    manipulated

Yes, but I do think fixing the naming will help that.

>  - it breaks the basic get/put refcounting for
>    nsproxy references outside the task struct
>    i.e. we had to add a vs_put_nsproxy() which
>    does what the put_nsproxy() did before, to
>    keep and handle a reference to the nsproxy 
>    from the context structure

Was the put_and_finalize_nsproxy() not sufficient?

>  - the following scenario might become a problem
>    for future spaces (especially the pid space?)
> 
>             A                       B
> 
>  exit_task_namespaces_early()
> 			exit_task_namespaces_early()
> 			exit_notify()
> 			exit_task_namespaces()
>  ---------------------------------------------------
>  exit_notify()
>  exit_task_namespaces()

Confounded, you're right, the exit_task_namespaces() in B
would see that B had reduced the nsproxy->count to 0, and
free the nsproxy, so that exit_notify() in A would oops.
And that should be triggerable right now.

I'm afraid adding an extra refcount for the mounts is
unavoidable.

> note: I still consider it the best available fix
> for this issues, especially as 2.6.20 is in a 
> late rc stage ... but IMHO the nfs threads should
> be modified to handle the nsproxy disposal properly

That *would* lead to much more readable code.

> > And Daniel, if you can find time to runtime test it please?
> 
> he did, looks like it works fine with vanilla too
> (even when stressing the described cornercase)
> 
> best,
> Herbert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/