On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:49:14 -0800
"Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:31:20 -0800
> > "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 14:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As Christoph says, it's very much preferred that code be migrated over to
> >>>> kmap_atomic(). Partly because kmap() is deadlockable in situations where a
> >>>> large number of threads are trying to take two kmaps at the same time and
> >>>> we run out. This happened in the past, but incidences have gone away,
> >>>> probably because of kmap->kmap_atomic conversions.
> >>>> From which callsite have you measured problems?
> >>> CONFIG_HIGHPTE code in -rt was horrid. I'll do some measurements on
> >>> mainline.
> >>>
> >> CONFIG_HIGHPTE is always horrid -we've known that for years.
> >
> > We have? What's wrong with it? <looks around for bug reports>
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0307.0/0463.html
2% overhead for a pte-intensive workload for unknown reasons four years
ago. Sort of a mini-horrid, no?
We still don't know what is the source of kmap() activity which
necessitated this patch btw. AFAIK the busiest source is ext2 directories,
but perhaps NFS under certain conditions?
<looks at xfs_iozero>
->prepare_write no longer requires that the caller kmap the page.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]