Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Auke Kok wrote: >> >> Yes. A few hundred cycles of loading/unloading snd_hda_intel with enable_msi=1 >> didn't break it on i386. >> >> I sure hope this can get into 2.6.20! > > Eric, can you write an explanation, add your sign-off, Auke's ACK, and > send out the result? The patch looked ok to me, but I do want the more > deeper explanation too (and sign-off, of course). Sure. Give me a couple of minutes. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- Prev by Date: Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- Next by Date: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] Add support to OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs -- update
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible regression: MSI vector leakage since 2.6.18-rc5ish (Unable to repeatedly allocate/free MSI interrupt)
- Next by thread: [PATCH] i386: In assign_irq_vector look at all vectors before giving up
- Index(es):