lockmeter — Linux Kernel

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 08:52:25AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Mmm. not wholly convinced that's true. Whilst i don't have lockmeter
> stats to hand, the heavy time in __d_lookup seems to indicate we may
> still have a problem to me. I guess we could move the spinlocks out
> of line again to test this fairly easily (or get lockmeter upstream).

We definitly should get lockmeter in.  Does anyone volunteer for doing
the cleanup and merged?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: lockmeter
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: lockmeter
  - From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/7] breaking the global file_list_lock
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] breaking the global file_list_lock
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] breaking the global file_list_lock
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] breaking the global file_list_lock
  - From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] breaking the global file_list_lock
Next by thread: Re: lockmeter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]