On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > > > Track mlocked pages via a ZVC
> >
> > Why?
>
> Large amounts of mlocked pages may be a problem for
>
> 1. Reclaim behavior.
>
> 2. Defragmentation
>
We know that. What has that to do with this patch?
>
> > You could perhaps go for a walk across all the other vmas which presently
> > map this page. If any of them have VM_LOCKED, don't increment the counter.
> > Similar on removal: only decrement the counter when the final mlocked VMA
> > is dropping the pte.
>
> For that we would need an additional refcount for vmlocked maps in the
> page struct.
No you don't. The refcount is already there. It is "the sum of the VM_LOCKED
VMAs which map this page".
It might be impractical or expensive to calculate it, but it's there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
