Re: [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] alsa: correct nonsensical sysfs device symlinks

[xiphmont@xiph.org]

On 1/25/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:30:44 -0500,
> xiphmont@xiph.org wrote:
> >
> > > I'm working on this now and will doublecheck just in case my test was
> > > flawed first time.
> >
> > Doublechecking indicates my initial test was wrong somehow; both
> > card->dev->parent and card->parent passed as arg 2 to the
> > device_create call in snd_register_device result in correct device
> > symlinks. Are these two actually semantically different?  I'm just
> > curious.
>
> If card->dev is created, they should be identical.
> But, again, card->dev should be NULL on the older systems.
>
> > The call to device_create in cound_core.c:sound_insert_unit also needs
> > to be modified in order for the device symlinks in the other unit
> > types to be correct.  Again, modifying the 'dev' argument to
> > '(dev?dev->parent:NULL)' appears to fix the problem.  Is that
> > correct/appropriate there?
>
> Your change breaks the expected heavior if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
> enabled.  Then devices won't belong to card* objects any more...

FWIW, CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is enabled on all my machines-- it's
exactly that behavior that is wrong in 2.6.20-rc5 and that I'm trying
to fix (and testing against here/now).

Having just checked a 2.6.18 machine, none of the device symlinks
point to card* objects; thay all point to /sys/devices/....

Monty
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/