Re: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 
> I don't think you want to just set the incore inode security state on
> the client side, as that won't be preserved.

I agree. The fix seems much worse than the problem.

It doesn't seem to be a kernel bug (except insofar that you can argue that 
enabling ACL's at all is a bug), and it also doesn't look like a 
regression.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] NFS Bugfixes for 2.6.20-rc5
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs
  - From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Implement shadow directory support for device classes.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] serial driver PMC MSP71xx, kernel linux-mips.git mast er
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs
Next by thread: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 3/3] NFS: Ensure we support selinux xattrs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]