* Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > I think his approach was wrong that's why I'm resistant to his > implementation .. [...] how can you still say this while you showed clear misunderstanding of what Thomas did and why? Why should i care about you being 'resistant' to anything under these circumstances? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- Prev by Date: Re: One-shot high-resolution POSIX timer periodically late
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Limit the size of the pagecache
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
- Index(es):
 |