On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Rossell, I am confused.
> >> There are many places in kernel where there is static __initdata
> >> without initialization. Should all these be corrected too? Or your
> >> comment applies only to none static global data?
> >
> >From what I remembered from previous mails on this list (which is what
> >caused me to pick up on this), and what I later quoted from the gcc
> >manual, all those places (where something is marked __initdata but is
> >not explicitly initialised) would appear to be incorrect.
> >
> >So they should probably be fixed up.
>
> Well... A lot of places in the kernel needs to be fixed, regardless
> this patch... I can probably creat a patch for this as well... But
> since I don't an expert in this one... We need to be sure this should
> be fixed.
Don't particularly care; the amount of time spent discussing this issue
is becoming rather rediculous, so I'd rather we reached some conclusion
very soon; to this end this is going to be my last response on this
subject.
I suggest that we leave what's already there, but any new instances we
create are correct to the gcc manual.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
