On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 18:03 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> What happened to all those advanced page replacement endeavors?
They are here:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/page-replace/2.6.19-pr1/
I should update to .20 soonish.
> What is the most promising of those?
I'm still torn between CLOCK-Pro and CART.
CLOCK-Pro is still vulnerable to the cyclic scan use case, since at that
time all pages will have equal distance.
CART might be fixable (my CART-r approach) but I still have to study the
full ramifications of that (does it hurt other workloads?).
Both seems quite capable to distinguish between recency and frequency.
Neither use this horrid swappiness knob to distinguish between mapped
and unmapped pages.
The main problem I'm having is test cases, notably the lack thereof.
(and lack of time ofcourse ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
