Re: Why active list and inactive list?

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > It would be really nice if we came up with a page replacement
> > algorithm that did not need many extra heuristics to make it
> > work...
>
> I guess the "clock" type algorithms are the most promising in that 
> area. What happened to all those advanced page replacement endeavors? 
> What is the most promising of those? You seem to have done a lot of work 
> on those.

CLOCK-Pro seems the most promising algorithm, because it can
act well both as a first level cache (operating system running
applications) and as a second level cache (operating system
running as a file server), because it tracks both recency and
frequency well.

However, there are a few unanswered questions on clock-pro.

The big one is how we are to do some background aging in a
clock-pro system, so referenced bits don't just pile up when
the VM has enough memory - otherwise we might not know the
right pages to evict when a new process starts up and starts
allocating lots of memory.

At least we've solved the problems of keeping track of the
recently evicted pages in a cheap way, and balancing the
pressure/hotness of different caches against each other.

--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/