Re: [patch 03/26] Dynamic kernel command-line - arm

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:23:26 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> > Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 01:58:52PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: 
> > >> -static char command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
> > >> +static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE];
> > > 
> > > Uninitialised data is placed in the BSS.  Adding __initdata to BSS
> > > data causes grief.
> > > 
> > 
> > Static variables are implicitly initialized to zero. Does that also
> > count as initialization?
> 
> No.  As I say, they're placed in the BSS.  The BSS is zeroed as part of
> the C runtime initialisation.

I don't understand the objection.  With the above change, command_line[]
will end up consuming COMMAND_LINE_SIZE bytes of .data.init and will be
reliably initialized to all-zeros by the compiler (won't it?)

> If you want to place a variable in a specific section, it must be
> explicitly initialised.  Eg,
> 
> static char __initdata command_line[COMMAND_LINE_SIZE] = "";
> 
> However, there is a bigger question here: that is the tradeoff between
> making this variable part of the on-disk kernel image, but throw away
> the memory at runtime, or to leave it in the BSS where it will not be
> part of the on-disk kernel image, but will not be thrown away at
> runtime.

Yes, it'll take some space in vmlinux.  We could perhaps create a new
__initbss to prevent that, I assume.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/