On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Ivan Ukhov wrote: > It's a tiny driver and it hardy can be a part of the mainline kernel > because of its useless for everyone but me, beside I don't want to make > someone modify the kernel code. Then, when this is a non-standard situation anyway, would calling hid_disconnect() for the usb_interface of your driver be enough? -- Jiri Kosina - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Ivan Ukhov <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- References:
- How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Ivan Ukhov <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Ivan Ukhov <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
- Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- From: Ivan Ukhov <[email protected]>
- How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- Prev by Date: Re: Realtime-preemption for 2.6.20-rc5 ?
- Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0
- Previous by thread: Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- Next by thread: Re: How to use an usb interface than is claimed by HID?
- Index(es):
 |