On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Eeuh, right. Glad to have you around to remind how puny my boxens > are :-) Sorry about that but it was unavoidable if we want to get to reasonable limits that will work in all situations. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG: linux 2.6.19 unable to enable acpi
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Don't map random pages if swapoff errors
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- Index(es):
 |