On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Cache misses for small packet flow due to the fact, that the same data > > is allocated and freed and accessed on different CPUs will become an > > issue soon, not right now, since two-four core CPUs are not yet to be > > very popular and price for the cache miss is not _that_ high. > > SGI does networking too, right? Sslab deals with those issues the right way. We have per processor queues that attempt to keep the cache hot state. A special shared queue exists between neighboring processors to facilitate exchange of objects between then. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Stop making "inline" imply forced inlining.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
- Next by thread: [PATCH 3/9] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context
- Index(es):
 |