Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()

On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 19:26 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Martin, are you OK with comments tweaking in s390 code?
> -----------------------------------------
> [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()

Yes, this should be fine now.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: REQUESTED TO BE OUR REPRESENTATIVE/BOOK KEEPER.
Next by Date: Re: long disable of Softirqs in br_forward_delay_timer_expired()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidate bust_spinlocks()
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] Extract and use wake_up_klogd()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]