On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> actually, it *appears* that the standard works this way. the macro
> "__deprecated" is defined in compiler-gcc.h with:
>
> #define __deprecated __attribute__((deprecated))
>
> while the more generic compiler.h handles whether or not it was
> defined:
>
> #ifndef __deprecated
> # define __deprecated /* unimplemented */
> #endif
>
> so i'm guessing that's how any new attribute shortcut macros should be
> handled, yes?
Well, since the definitions lived well in compiler-generic land for quite
some time, I'd guess it should be ok not to #ifndef - guard them.
likely() and unlikely() are currently handled like that.
If the need ever arises to make them compiler specific, whoever does that
can still add the #ifndef then.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]