Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken

* Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote:

> And actually the lock stuff is OK, since it's not inlined -- it's the 
> unlock stuff that goes directly to the __raw versions.  But something 
> like the following works for me; does it look OK to you?

yeah, it looks good to me too. Hopefully this will work with the include 
file ordering of all platforms.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
  - From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
  - From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] flush_cpu_workqueue: don't flush an empty ->worklist
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kwatch: kernel watchpoints using CPU debug registers
Previous by thread: Re: On some configs, sparse spinlock balance checking is broken
Next by thread: [PATCH] intel_agp: restore graphics device's pci space early in resume
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]