Re: [PATCH 48/59] sysctl: Register the ocfs2 sysctl numbers

On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:39:53AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> - unquoted
> 
> ocfs2 was did not have the binary number it uses under CTL_FS
> registered in sysctl.h.  Register it to avoid future conflicts,
> and change the name of the definition to be in line with the
> rest of the sysctl numbers.

This looks good - ACK.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
[email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/59] Cleanup sysctl
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH 48/59] sysctl: Register the ocfs2 sysctl numbers
  - From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc5: BUG: lock held at task exit time! (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c013bfff>] enter_state+0x3f/0x170
Next by Date: Re: [RFC 8/8] Reduce inode memory usage for systems with a high MAX_NUMNODES
Previous by thread: [PATCH 48/59] sysctl: Register the ocfs2 sysctl numbers
Next by thread: [PATCH 13/59] sysctl: xfs remove unnecessary insert_at_head flag
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]