Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2007.01.15 18:34:43 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> >>My latest bisection attempt actually led to your sata_nv ADMA commit. [1]
> >>I've now backed out that patch from 2.6.20-rc5 and have my stress test
> >>running for 20 minutes now ("record" for a bad kernel surviving that
> >>test is about 40 minutes IIRC). I'll keep it running for at least 2 more
> >>hours.
> >
> >Yep, that one seems to be guilty. 2.6.20-rc5 with that commit backed out
> >survived about 3 hours of testing, while the average was around 5
> >minutes for a failure, sometimes even before I could log in.
> >I took a look at the patch, but I can't really tell anything.
> >nv_adma_check_atapi_dma somehow looks like it should not negate its
> >return value, so that it returns 0 (atapi dma available) when
> >adma_enable was 1. But I'm not exactly confident about that either ;)
> >Will it hurt if I try to remove the negation?
> 
> It should be correct the way it is - that check is trying to prevent 
> ATAPI commands from using DMA until the slave_config function has been 
> called to set up the DMA parameters properly. When the 
> NV_ADMA_ATAPI_SETUP_COMPLETE flag is not set, this returns 1 which 
> disallows DMA transfers. Unless you were using an ATAPI (i.e. CD/DVD) 
> device on the channel this wouldn't affect you anyway.

I wondered about it, because the flag is cleared when adma_enabled is 1,
which seems to be consistent with everything but nv_adma_check_atapi_dma.
Thus I thought that nv_adma_check_atapi_dma might be wrong, but maybe
setting/clearing the flag is wrong instead? *feels lost*

> I'll try your stress test when I get a chance, but I doubt I'll run into 
> the same problem and I haven't seen any similar reports. Perhaps it's 
> some kind of wierd timing issue or incompatibility between the 
> controller and that drive when running in ADMA mode? I seem to remember 
> various reports of issues with certain Maxtor drives and some nForce 
> SATA controllers under Windows at least..

I just checked Maxtor's knowledge base, that incompatibility does not
affect my drive.

Thanks,
Björn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux