Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:11:13PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Florin Iucha <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Based on this info, I think we can rule out any USB.  I will try
> > testing with NFS3 to see if the problem persists.  Unfortunately there
> > is no oops or anything in "dmesg".
> 
> Take a look at bz #7796, a NFS bug + fix. But my feelin is that this is
> older.

The reported had and oops?  Luxury!  I get nothing ;)

I am testing again, this time on 2.6.20-rc5 compiled with extra debug
and I got a couple dozens of:

   "eth0: too many iterations (6) in nv_nic_irq."

in the kernel log.

florin

-- 
Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition.
      http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux