Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Looks like all of these errors are from a FLUSH CACHE command and the drive is indicating that it is no longer busy, so presumably done. That's not a DMA-mapped command, so it wouldn't go through the ADMA machinery and I wouldn't have expected this to be handled any differently from before. Curious..

It's possible the flush-cache command takes longer than 30 seconds, if the cache is large, contents are discontiguous, etc. It's a pathological case, but possible.

Or maybe flush-cache doesn't get a 30 second timeout, and it should...? (thinking out loud)

    Jeff

If the flush was still in progress I would expect Busy to still be set, however..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux