Re: /sys/$DEVPATH/uevent vs uevent attributes

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:10PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 
> (No patch at this time, -- just asking about an.. idea ;)

Let's see what such a patch looks like to see if it would be workable or
not.

And no one forces you to use udev, I have machines with a static /dev
that work just fine :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /sys/$DEVPATH/uevent vs uevent attributes
  - From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>

References:
- /sys/$DEVPATH/uevent vs uevent attributes
  - From: Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] NMI watchdog lockups caused by mwait_idle
Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: sata_sil24 lockups under heavy i/o
Previous by thread: /sys/$DEVPATH/uevent vs uevent attributes
Next by thread: Re: /sys/$DEVPATH/uevent vs uevent attributes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]