Hi. On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 22:07 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Thanks, Nigel. > But I'm very sorry that the calculation in the patch was wrong. > > Would you give this new patch a run? Sorry for my slowness. I just did time find /usr/src | wc -l again: Without patch: 35.137, 35.104, 35.351 seconds With patch: 34.518, 34.376, 34.489 seconds So there's about .8 seconds saved. Regards, Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Suparna Bhattacharya <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- How git affects kernel.org performance
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I create or read/write a file in linux device driver?
- Next by Date: Re: kvm & dyntick
- Previous by thread: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- Next by thread: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance
- Index(es):
 |