It occurs to me that kvm could benefit greatly from dyntick:
dyntick-enabled host:
- generate virtual interrupts at whatever HZ the guest programs its
timers, be it 100, 250, 1000 or whatever
- avoid expensive vmexits due to useless timer interrupts
dyntick-enabled guest:
- reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
(currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)
What are the current plans wrt dyntick? Is it planned for 2.6.21?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]