On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:12:02PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Chinner wrote:
>
> > Well, pdflush appears to be doing very little on both 2.6.18 and
> > 2.6.20-rc3. In both cases kswapd is consuming 10-20% of a CPU and
> > all of the pdflush threads combined (I've seen up to 7 active at
> > once) use maybe 1-2% of cpu time. This occurs regardless of the
> > dirty_ratio setting.
>
> That sounds a bit much for kswapd. How many nodes? Any cpusets in use?
It's an x86-64 box - an XE 240 - 4 core, 16GB RAM, single node, no cpusets.
> A upper maximum on the number of pdflush threads exists at 8. Are these
> multiple files or single file transfers?
See the test case i posted - a single file write per filesystem, three
filesystems being written to at once, all on different, unshared block
devices.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
