On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 17:14 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 11:49 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > > > usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 68
> > > > usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 68
> > > > usb 2-1: unable to read config index 0 descriptor/start
> > > > usb 2-1: chopping to 0 config(s)
> > >
> > > Does anybody know a legitimate reasons a device should have
> > > 0 configurations? Independent of the reason of this bug, should we disallow
> > > such devices and error out?
> >
> > About the only reason to allow such devices is so that the user can run
> > lsusb to try and get more information about the problem. With no
> > configurations, the device won't be useful for anything.
>
> Regarding the bug this device uncovers, it seems to me that this in drivers/base/core.c
> if (parent)
> klist_add_tail(&dev->knode_parent, &parent->klist_children);
> should make knode_parent a valid node under all circumstances.
> Hm.
I haven't seen the original bug report. Where does the NULL pointer deref
occur?
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]