--- Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:02:35 -0800 (PST) Amit Choudhary wrote:
>
> No thanks. If a driver author wants to maintain driver state
> that way, it's OK, but that doesn't make it a global requirement.
>
Ok. So, a driver can have its own local definition of KFREE() macro.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
