Hello All,
This question might sound dumb for many, and to some annoying too ;-)
Am enterting into -rc Kernel (testing & analysis) & involvement with
the kernel (contributing to patches). I have this doubt. I did refer
to applying-patches in the kernel documentation, this is what I got:-
These are the base stable releases released by Linus. The highest numbered
release is the most recent.
If regressions or other serious flaws are found, then a -stable fix patch
will be released (see below) on top of this base. Once a new 2.6.x base
kernel is released, a patch is made available that is a delta between the
previous 2.6.x kernel and the new one.
To apply a patch moving from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12, you'd do the following (note
that such patches do *NOT* apply on top of 2.6.x.y kernels but on top of the
base 2.6.x kernel -- if you need to move from 2.6.x.y to 2.6.x+1 you need to
first revert the 2.6.x.y patch).
I did understand till here. Should I start compile/test/debug
one-after-one in this fashion:-
2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc1
2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc2
2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc3
2.6.19 source + patch-2.6.20-rc4
OR
Pick the latest release number?
Note:
Am working for different requirements in the Labs with Linux
(Telecom/Embedded). This activity starting as an independant activity
in my home/sometimes in Labs. So, I wanted to jump into kernel
development (mainly as compile/test/debug/patch). Hope I get enough
encouragement ;-)
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]