On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:37:25AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> One other approach I was thinking about, was to do all the hardwork in
> workqueue CPU_DOWN_PREPARE callback rather than in CPU_DEAD.
Between DOWN_PREPARE and DEAD, more work can get added to the cpu's
workqueue. So DOWN_PREPARE is kind of early to take_over_work ..
> We can call cleanup_workqueue_thread and take_over_work in DOWN_PREPARE,
> With that, I don't think we need to hold the workqueue_mutex across
> these two callbacks and eliminate the deadlocks related to
> flush_workqueue.
> Do you think this approach would simply things around here?
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
