On Monday, January 8, 2007 12:32 pm, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > The routines could probably be consolidated into a single
> > probe_intel_9xx routine or something, but I really looked at that
> > yet (though there are many similarities between the 91[05], 945 and
> > 965 families, they may not be enough that the code would actually
> > be simpler if shared.
>
> The individual functions are so simple, it's probably way better for
> maintainance simplicity to keep them separate, at least for now.
Yeah, sounds good.
> > + pci_conf1_read(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0,0), 0x48, 4, &pciexbar);
> > +
> > + /* No enable bit or size field, so assume 256M range is enabled.
> > */ + len = 0x10000000U;
> > + pci_mmcfg_config_num = 1;
> > +
> > + pci_mmcfg_config = kzalloc(sizeof(pci_mmcfg_config[0]),
> > GFP_KERNEL); + pci_mmcfg_config[0].base_address = pciexbar;
>
> Hmmm, I'd mask out the reserved bits if I were you. Paranoia :-)
Wouldn't hurt I suppose, want me to post a new patch?
Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]